• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

Phys. Plasmas 7, 991 (2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.873898 (10 pages)

On the gyrokinetic equilibrium

H. Qin, W. M. Tang, G. Rewoldt, and W. W. Lee

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08543

(Received 13 August 1999; accepted 1 November 1999)

Recent developments in gyrokinetic-magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) theory and in electromagnetic gyrokinetic particle simulations raise the question of consistency between the gyrokinetic model and the fluid model. Due to the special characteristics of the guiding center coordinates, it is a nontrivial exercise to show this consistency. In this paper it is shown, in a very general setting, that the gyrokinetic theory and the fluid equations do give an equivalent description of plasma equilibrium (∂/∂t = 0). The fluid continuity equation and momentum equation for equilibrium plasmas are recovered entirely from the gyrokinetic theory. However, it was Spitzer who first realized the importance of consistency between guiding-center motion and fluid equations. In particular, he studied the “apparent paradoxical result” regarding the difference between perpendicular particle flow and guiding-center flow, which will be referred to as the Spitzer paradox in this paper. By recovering the fluid equations from the gyrokinetic theory, we automatically resolve the Spitzer paradox, whose essence is how the perpendicular current and flow are microscopically generated from particles’ guiding-center motion. The mathematical construction in the gyrokinetic theory which relates observable quantities in the laboratory frame to the distribution function in the guiding-center coordinates is consistent with Spitzer’s original physical picture, while today’s gyrokinetic-MHD theory covers a much wider range of problems in a much more general and quantitative way. © 2000 American Institute of Physics.

© 2000 American Institute of Physics

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 52.25.Fi

    Transport properties

  • 52.25.Dg

    Plasma kinetic equations

  • 52.35.Py

    Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.)

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1070-664X (print)  
1089-7674 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    R. G. Littlejohn, J. Math. Phys. 20, 2445 (1979)JMAPAQ000020000012002445000001.

    R. G. Littlejohn, Phys. Fluids 24, 1730 (1981)PFLDAS000024000009001730000001.

    W. W. Lee, Phys. Fluids 26, 556 (1983)PFLDAS000026000002000556000001.

    D. H. E. Dubin, J. A. Krommes, C. Oberman, and W. W. Lee, Phys. Fluids 26, 3524 (1983)PFLDAS000026000012003524000001.

    T. S. Hahm, Phys. Fluids 31, 2670 (1988)PFLDAS000031000009002670000001.

    T. S. Hahm, W. W. Lee, and A. Brizard, Phys. Fluids 31, 1940 (1988)PFLDAS000031000007001940000001.

    A. J. Brizard, Phys. Fluids B 1, 1381 (1989)PFBPEI000001000007001381000001.

    H. Qin, W. M. Tang, and G. Rewoldt, Phys. Plasmas 5, 1035 (1998)PHPAEN000005000004001035000001.

    H. Qin, W. M. Tang, W. W. Lee, and G. Rewoldt, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1575 (1999)PHPAEN000006000005001575000001.

    H. Qin, W. M. Tang, and G. Rewoldt, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2544 (1999)PHPAEN000006000006002544000001.

    W. W. Lee and W. M. Tang, Phys. Fluids 31, 612 (1988)PFLDAS000031000003000612000001.

    S. E. Parker, W. W. Lee, and R. A. Santoro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2042 (1993).

    A. M. Dimits, T. J. Williams, J. A. Byers, and B. I. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 71 (1996).


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close